Jacopo Berrettini vs Igor Kudriashov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• The recent second serve performance shows Jacopo Berrettini winning slightly more points (45.49%) compared to Igor Kudriashov (45.13%). Could this indicate better consistency under serve pressure? Perhaps.
• Regarding returning skills, Berrettini again leads by winning 48.26% of second serve return points, just ahead of Kudriashov at 45.10%. First serve returns tell a similar story, with Berrettini winning 29.88% compared to Kudriashov's 27.80%.
• Under pressure, Berrettini significantly outperforms Kudriashov by saving 58.35% of break points, against Kudriashov's 47.43%. Does this hint at Berrettini's mental tenacity? Quite possibly.
• Yearly performance rates show Kudriashov having a slightly higher win percentage (63.64%) than Berrettini's 61.02%.
• Surface performance indicates Berrettini is stronger on Clay with 58% career wins, while Kudriashov is better on Hard courts, also with 58% wins. Does the match surface favor one player today? This would depend on where the match is played.
• Kudriashov has faced tougher competition, playing against higher-ranked opponents (average rank 322.29) compared to Berrettini's opponents (average rank 395.69).
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Kudriashov has a higher win rate of 65% in such situations, compared to Berrettini's 55%.
• Both players excel on different event levels: Berrettini mostly in Challengers, whereas Kudriashov mainly performs well in Futures/Satellites, with the latter holding a better win percentage at this level.

Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):

When analyzing the tennis match between Jacopo Berrettini and Igor Kudriashov, several factors present contrasting strengths and weaknesses for each player.

Berrettini slightly edges out Kudriashov in terms of second serve performance and return game statistics, indicating a potential strength in handling serve-related situations. Additionally, he shows resilience by saving more break points, which could be pivotal in closely contested games.

However, Kudriashov's overall win rate in deciding sets provides him with a potential advantage should the match reach a critical stage. Moreover, his experience against higher-ranked opponents might give him a competitive edge.

While Berrettini performs notably well on Clay, this advantage will depend significantly on the match being on his preferred surface. In contrast, Kudriashov's comfort on Hard surfaces could be influential given his past performances.

Taking all these aspects into account, the outcome of this match could be tightly contested. Yet, based on competitive experience and surface adaptability, Igor Kudriashov appears to have a slight edge as the likely winner.